Jodie Fisher's allegations of sexual harassment are made believable due to Mark Hurd's:

• A. Conflict of interests
• B. Misuse of company assets
• C. Inaccurate expense reports
• D. All of the above

Answer: (D)

The key idea is that credibility of a claim about misconduct is shaped by the broader pattern of behavior from the person involved. When an executive is shown to engage in other questionable actions, it signals a tendency toward unethical behavior and weak governance, which makes allegations of harassment more plausible to investigators and observers.

Conflict of interest shows the leader may make decisions for personal gain rather than for the organization, undermining trust and suggesting a habit of self-serving conduct. Misuse of company assets demonstrates a disregard for the resources and rules that protect the firm, further eroding credibility and pointing to a pattern of unethical behavior. Inaccurate expense reports reveal dishonesty and weak controls, reinforcing concerns about integrity and accountability.

Together, these issues create a consistent picture of poor judgment and unethical conduct, which strengthens the perceived plausibility of the harassment allegations. That’s why all of these factors together best explain why the allegations could be believable.